News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by quotemstr on Saturday March 30, 2024 @07:18PM (#39879598)
Doesn't matter. This is a supply chain attack, not a vulnerability arising from a bug. All sandboxing the certificate parsing code would have done is make the author of the backdoor do a little bit more work to hijack the necessarily un-sandboxed supervisor process.

Applying the usual exploit mitigations to supply chain attacks won't do much good.

What will? Kill distribution tarballs. Make every binary bit for bit reproducible from a known git hash. Minimize dependencies. Run whole programs with minimal privileges.

Oh, and finally support SHA2 in git to forever forestall some kind of preimage attack against a git commit hash.

Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by nurple on Saturday March 30, 2024 @08:05PM (#39879928)
Oh boy, do I have the packaging system for you!
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by LtWorf on Sunday March 31, 2024 @04:32PM (#39887817)
Malware can be in commits as well…
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by quotemstr on Monday April 01, 2024 @08:31AM (#39893448)
But it's harder to hide there
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by LtWorf on Tuesday April 02, 2024 @03:42PM (#39910031)
Just do a "fix style" that deletes and re-addds every line-
Re:XZ backdoor: "It's RCE, not auth bypass, and gated/unrepl... by int_19h on Sunday March 31, 2024 @06:02PM (#39888473)
... and stop adding random patches to upstream software, especially when we're talking about security-critical stuff that must absolutely not be released without a very thorough security review.