News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by neilv on Saturday March 30, 2024 @01:49PM (#39876981)
IIRC, Sourceforge's reputation was being tarnished even before the malware. Sourceforge had some kind of data loss incident, whereupon open source developers I knew started referring to it as "Sourceforget".

Later, one day someone said in a group of Linux developers, "So, Linus made a version control system...", kinda amused. I didn't know whether Torvalds was actually going to use it for Linux, and didn't even consider that it might be adopted by pretty much all software developers of any kind.

It was even named "git", like it was aggressively trying to be unmarketable.

But at some point, GitHub emerged, and grew a very favorable reputation. Then they sold out.

Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by doublerabbit on Saturday March 30, 2024 @03:33PM (#39877874)
> Then they sold out.

Ah, finally someone recollects the original.

People look at me funny when I tell them it wasn't an Microsoft creation.

Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by Affric on Saturday March 30, 2024 @05:54PM (#39879040)
Christ I am old
Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by DANmode on Sunday March 31, 2024 @05:16AM (#39882682)
"People"?
Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host... by ahartmetz on Sunday March 31, 2024 @05:30AM (#39882733)
Jeez man, everyone knows that most Microsoft products with any success are acquisitions. In the cases of Windows NT and C#, they just bought the designers.