Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host...
by akira2501 on Saturday March 30, 2024 @02:46PM
(#39877507)
It was a funny and gross moment shortly after the corporation I was working at had acquired CNet where every IT department was notified by corporate IT that download.com was not a reliable site and should _never_ be used to download software into the company.
Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host...
by justinclift on Tuesday April 02, 2024 @12:59AM
(#39902529)
Heh, so they bought CNet then suddenly it was banned and traffic dropped off a cliff or something?
Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host...
by outop on Saturday March 30, 2024 @03:36PM
(#39877891)
That's the company that bought Slashdot isn't it?
Re:How GitHub replaced SourceForge as the dominant code host...
by ChrisMarshallNY on Saturday March 30, 2024 @03:47PM
(#39877983)
Yup.
/. is a faint shadow of what they once were.
TBF, it wasn't just Dice. At that time, CNN and Yahoo (I think) nuked their trollgard- er, comments, and they all went to slashdot. It became the place to go, for top-quality Nazi ASCII art.
They'd been recently bought by a shitty company called DICE that also owned ummm... CNet or Download.com, or some other similar place with lots of downloads for Windows users:
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dice.com
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SourceForge#Adware_controversy
That company already served ~malware~ sorry "bundled third party offers" with their windows downloads, and figured they'd be able to copy-n-paste that approach to popular OSS downloads.
That's not how it played out however, as some of us actually give a shit about things like that. ;)