Re:Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server com...
by heyoni on Saturday March 30, 2024 @12:28AM
(#39871840)
But why won’t banks at least support customer provided yubikeys?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server com...
by intelVISA on Saturday March 30, 2024 @02:04AM
(#39872252)
Banks loathe anything relating, or adjacent, to good SWE principles.
Re:Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server com...
by mulmen on Saturday March 30, 2024 @01:52AM
(#39872197)
> But why won’t banks at least support customer provided yubikeys?
> support
You answered your own question.
Re:Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server com...
by heyoni on Saturday March 30, 2024 @11:58AM
(#39876065)
And that’s the answer isn’t it? Banks are behind the times in terms of security and tech.
Re:Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server com...
by eru on Saturday March 30, 2024 @01:21AM
(#39872066)
Because it's extra hassle?
Re:Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server com...
by jalk on Saturday March 30, 2024 @05:49AM
(#39873333)
Bank of America supports user purchased TOTP devices.
https://www.bankofamerica.com/security-center/online-mobile-...
Re:Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server com...
by rainbowzootsuit on Saturday March 30, 2024 @08:46AM
(#39874338)
Brokerage, not bank, but you can do Yubikey-only at Vanguard.
Re:Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server com...
by mlrtime on Saturday March 30, 2024 @09:04AM
(#39874487)
The largest US crypto brokerages/exchanges support yubikey.
Some will provide and require them for top customers to ensure they are safe.
Re:Backdoor in upstream xz/liblzma leading to SSH server com...
by ryukoposting on Sunday March 31, 2024 @08:58PM
(#39889802)
I'd guess part of the reason is that customers would blame the bank when their YubiKey doesn't work, which would become a nuisance for them as much as the YubiKey's usability issues are a nuisance for the customer.