News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel Brags of $152B in Stock Buybacks. Why Does It Need ... by robertlagrant on Thursday March 28, 2024 @09:48AM (#39851410)
> My point was that executives (share sellers) benefit and it creates potentially toxic incentives.

This seems like a good incentive. Executives of course don't have to have any shares, although they probably will, but that's not "toxic".

I know that toxic is now the blandest word in the language due to overuse, but even given that this seems distortional.

There are no comments on this comment yet.