Re:Want to start a startup? Meet all the YC partners in Bost...
by Arisaka1 on Thursday March 28, 2024 @05:44AM
(#39849207)
I do think you are entitled to filter for a specific age group implicitly, but it doesn't make it any less discriminatory.
Example: statistically the odds of someone graduating from college being over 30 are low. Therefore if I claim that I hire college graduates I get to also filter implicitly by age.
Then the question is: assuming an inherent bias of sample, is it desirable or undesirable to introduce a "function" that attempts some mitigation? I see the "functions" that attempt to mitigate sexism, racism but not ageism.
It feels like companies or organizations are just fine with slapping a paragraph at the end of an announcement that parrots
"we are inclusive trust us" without any real adjustment and call it a day.
Example: statistically the odds of someone graduating from college being over 30 are low. Therefore if I claim that I hire college graduates I get to also filter implicitly by age.
Then the question is: assuming an inherent bias of sample, is it desirable or undesirable to introduce a "function" that attempts some mitigation? I see the "functions" that attempt to mitigate sexism, racism but not ageism.
It feels like companies or organizations are just fine with slapping a paragraph at the end of an announcement that parrots "we are inclusive trust us" without any real adjustment and call it a day.