Re:The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland Has C...
by nwiswell on Wednesday March 27, 2024 @04:12PM
(#39844008)
Those ships would never have been permitted in the Baltimore harbor. They presumably still aren't, since there's no reason for them to be there.
Re:The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland Has C...
by ViewTrick1002 on Thursday March 28, 2024 @10:19AM
(#39851847)
It only depends on where the large-scale refineries are. If Baltimore had one they would be going there.
The smaller VLCCs are dime a dozen and they are 2-3x the weight of the Dali.
Re:The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland Has C...
by nwiswell on Thursday March 28, 2024 @08:06PM
(#39859032)
The Port of Baltimore does not even have an oil handling facility, never mind the fact it could not admit a VLCC even if it had cause to.
Even ports on the US Gulf Coast do not generally have the capability to dock VLCCs.
https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=36232
If Baltimore had been anticipating VLCC traffic in the 70s, then presumably the bridge would have been built accordingly and this incident would not have led to a collapse.
The container vessel in question is tiny compared to e.g. the Seawise giant or Batillus Class.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seawise_Giant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batillus-class_supertanker