Re:Why isn't preprint review being adopted?
by adastra22 on Sunday March 24, 2024 @05:24PM
(#39810653)
No, it is not necessary. Just as it was not necessary for the first 300 years of the Royal society’s existence. “Peer review” used to be just a stand in phrase for the marketplace of ideas—seeing how your peers evaluate your work in a public process of getting published and sending letters to the editor. Only in living memory has it been warped into this pre-publication gatekeeping process.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.