Re:Cancer under age 50 increased 80% from 1990 to 2019
by friend_and_foe on Sunday March 24, 2024 @12:01AM
(#39805079)
Interestingly, if you do click the article, you'll find that they did not control for population. The 80% figure is in absolute nominal terms. It's more than the most elementary mistake, it's downright deceptive.
As it stands, the population has not grown 80% in the timespan given so even if they didn't control for population - which would be the most elementary mistake ever and no one would get published having made it - it still doesn't account for the effect size.
Reflexive scepticism, without any effort to verify, isn't any more useful than reflexive belief.