News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ask HN: What to do about non-performing "founder" by anmol on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @10:56PM (#3980220)
Aargh-- first of all, why don't you have vesting in place? what were you thinking being irresponsible?

Solution given the circumstances-- if you have any doubts, he has to go. It would be best to have a frank conversation, explain your reasoning, and wrap things up cleanly with paperwork from your lawyers. Convince him that its better to part in a good way and find something that excites him. Give him a fair separation agreement, e.g. pro-rated stock for the 3 months etc. Get everything in writing, help him find a good next gig, and you'll salvage the relationship AND your company.

I would recommend giving some stock even if you had vesting and he hadn't hit his cliff for a few reasons:

(a) startups are a small world, no point in making enemies

(b) a little stock aligns long-term incentives. If he goes, and the company is successful because of that, he actually makes $$. When you're getting acquired he'll be there to help, because he will see a financial outcome. Giving no stock breeds hate and resentment.

(c) Startups are hard, grueling experiences, not everyone makes it. Its OK.

Re:Ask HN: What to do about non-performing "founder" by throwaway1979 on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @11:35AM (#3982423)
How does vesting work with two or three founders? Is there a commonly used period? Any links would be appreciated. I recall hearing a while back that there are some good books on how to set this stuff correctly. Didn't pay attention at the time :( Any recs?
Re:Ask HN: What to do about non-performing "founder" by anmol on Thursday May 17, 2012 @10:12PM (#3990091)
Soak up every bit of venture hacks. Then read brad book called venture deals.