News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over ... by coderdude on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @10:20PM (#3980066)
The article ends with the news source they got the story from: http://www.techspot.com/news/48601-kodak-maintained-an-under...

The source is much cleaner than the submitted site. After reading both articles I feel that the submission is just a rip-off.

Edit: I didn't go deep enough down the rabbit hole. Thanks eli & falling.

Re:Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over ... by eli on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @11:17PM (#3980297)
No, actually that links to the poorly written gizmodo story. Itself a knockoff of the local paper, http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120511/NEWS01/...

Pretty sure that is both the original source and the most accurate write up.

Re:Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over ... by VMG on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @03:50AM (#3980938)
I am being presented with a paywall.
Re:Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over ... by uvdiv on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @03:57AM (#3980948)
Re:Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over ... by falling on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @11:21PM (#3980311)
I think this is the original source http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120511/NEWS01/...

and it's a better article too.

Re:Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over ... by gaius on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @04:17AM (#3981001)
I smell an agenda piece. Who are these "Center for Nonproliferation Studies" exactly? Is that even a real subject? What do they know about photographic imaging, which is all about radiation, or any other industrial process? Who are they that scientists should beg their permission to work?
Re:Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over ... by falling on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @10:00AM (#3982040)
really? the article seemed pretty neutral to me, no sensationalistic spin.