Post-quantum cryptography is too damn big

Re:Post-quantum cryptography is too damn big by bradleyjg on Saturday March 23, 2024 @10:53AM (#39800364)

I don’t expect commercially viable fusion, room temperature superconductors, or useful quantum computers in my lifetime.

The jury is still out on real self driving cars, but I’m less optimistic than I was five years ago.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Post-quantum cryptography is too damn big by xhkkffbf on Saturday March 23, 2024 @11:19AM (#39800574)

A friend of mine uses a self-driving taxi service in SF all of the time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Post-quantum cryptography is too damn big by bradleyjg on Saturday March 23, 2024 @11:27AM (#39800642)

How come you and all your other friends and family don’t? When do you think the rest of you will?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Post-quantum cryptography is too damn big by grayhatter on Saturday March 23, 2024 @12:14PM (#39800937)

I'd say in half the amount of time it took for us to go from the first internal combustion engine to the Model T? Or if you think that's a bad comparison: The Model T to the honda civic?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Post-quantum cryptography is too damn big by bradleyjg on Saturday March 23, 2024 @01:01PM (#39801354)

If that’s my odds are pretty good of living to see it. I hope you’re right.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Post-quantum cryptography is too damn big by xhkkffbf on Sunday March 24, 2024 @11:24AM (#39807800)

Because I don't live in SF. So ask the companies when they'll deploy elsewhere.

[ Parent | on HN ]