News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:First draft of HTML img srcset for responsive images by cleverjake on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @08:56PM (#3979799)
The last time I had to deal with this it was a result of links to a site from an email being attached to the user it was sent to (eg example.com/[email protected]). It was not a wonderful example, just a quick one. The moral being by caching query strings you risk needing to parse the ones being passed to ensure there in not unnecessary caching.
Re:First draft of HTML img srcset for responsive images by ZenPsycho on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @03:26AM (#3980890)
This use case seems abusive to me. I don't mind breaking abusive use cases.
Re:First draft of HTML img srcset for responsive images by cleverjake on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @10:47PM (#3985122)
Neither did XHTML.

Web Standards work requires you put up with a ton of really stupid things that people have been doing for a long time.

Re:First draft of HTML img srcset for responsive images by ZenPsycho on Thursday May 17, 2012 @08:45AM (#3986687)
I don't mean abusive in the sense that it's using technology in a way it was not intended to be used. I mean abusive as in actively harmful to the user's interests and privacy.