Re:Google Ordered to Identify Who Watched Certain YouTube Vi...
by Hnrobert42 on Friday March 22, 2024 @11:20PM
(#39797133)
A “literal crowd” sounds mildly pejorative. I think it’s more that HN prefers productive, rational discussions. Sarcasm is passive aggressive and a more circuitous route to the point than a literal one. Last, sarcasm isn’t usually even funny. When it is, it’s only funny to those who are with the point.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Ordered to Identify Who Watched Certain YouTube Vi...
by uoaei on Friday March 22, 2024 @11:30PM
(#39797167)
Critical feedback is still actionable. We don't need to guard adults from hearing difficult things and feeling difficult emotions.
Re:Google Ordered to Identify Who Watched Certain YouTube Vi...
by c0pium on Saturday March 23, 2024 @02:18AM
(#39797857)
That’s not what’s being suggested at all though. The problem with sarcasm is it’s boring but feels oh so clever to the person who writes it.
Re:Google Ordered to Identify Who Watched Certain YouTube Vi...
by ametrau on Saturday March 23, 2024 @01:26AM
(#39797694)
Let’s say block headed and pretty dumb.
Re:Google Ordered to Identify Who Watched Certain YouTube Vi...
by Hnrobert42 on Saturday March 23, 2024 @06:37AM
(#39798860)
Name calling is rarely useful. It certainly is not in this case, in addition to be patently false.