News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Bulma CSS framework reaches 1.0 by worble on Friday March 22, 2024 @11:11AM (#39791492)
I used to use Bulma a lot, but become frustrated by the fact certain items require you to use <a> tags for styling even if you don't want them to be clickable links, which is pretty bad for accessibility.

https://github.com/jgthms/bulma/issues/3548

Re:The Bulma CSS framework reaches 1.0 by diggan on Friday March 22, 2024 @11:55AM (#39791924)
If you skip using the href attribute, I think most accessibility tools wont see them as links anymore. Doesn't solve the issue but might be a workaround in the meantime.
Re:The Bulma CSS framework reaches 1.0 by bbx on Friday March 22, 2024 @12:52PM (#39792533)
Fair point. I'm planning on making those elements "tag" agnostic. That way, you can use a CSS class or a <button> instead of an <a>.
Re:The Bulma CSS framework reaches 1.0 by evantbyrne on Friday March 22, 2024 @02:01PM (#39793145)
Have you considered the possibility of programming? Found this in a few seconds with no prior knowledge of the project:

https://github.com/jgthms/bulma/blob/main/sass/components/ta...

I wish more developers who broadcast complaints about free software they rely on would at least attempt to contribute simple fixes to their own problems.

Re:The Bulma CSS framework reaches 1.0 by hsjsbeebue on Friday March 22, 2024 @05:45PM (#39795188)
It isn’t necessarily a bug. You have do to a lot if digging and discussion before you establish that.
Re:The Bulma CSS framework reaches 1.0 by evantbyrne on Friday March 22, 2024 @06:00PM (#39795319)
Tell that to him if you believe it to be relevant, not me. It is disrespectful to air dirty laundry in random threads while also not making any attempt to contribute even the simplest of patches for one's personal needs. I would hope that professional developers above all others would understand that OSS is supposed to be communal.