Re:Google Green - The Story of Send
by dugmartin on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @05:10PM
(#3978874)
Yes - this demo pegged my 4 core cpu on Chrome/Windows 64.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Green - The Story of Send
by magicalist on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @05:59PM
(#3979120)
That seems unlikely. For an accelerated tab you'll have the Tab process, the GPU process, and the Browser process. Even if you pegged all three (which is extremely unlikely considering the content), you'd still have a core to spare.
There's a point in there about the relative maturity of graphics code, but let's keep things honest (also, I think the Mac/Windows divide on Flash would be lessened if everyone had to use Flash on the other platform for a while. Imagine your CPU doing that on virtually every page that decides to embed a Flash ad and you'll get some idea of what it's like on a Mac).
Re:Google Green - The Story of Send
by icebraining on Tuesday May 15, 2012 @07:03PM
(#3979409)
Yet it ran fine on my single core two year old netbook on Firefox/Linux, while Flash rarely does.
Of course, Flash on Linux is even worse than on Windows.
Sounds like what Flash does on linux or OSX, 1:1 perfect replacement!
Re:Google Green - The Story of Send
by eevilspock on Wednesday May 16, 2012 @12:35AM
(#3980493)
Must be a Windows or Chrome problem. On my dual core 3-year-old Mac, Safari stayed between 20 and 30%.