Re:Amazon Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series
by gradascent on Friday March 22, 2024 @03:05AM
(#39788063)
fyi I think you have bias and variance the wrong way around. Over-fitting indicates high variance
Re:Amazon Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series
by wenc on Friday March 22, 2024 @03:08AM
(#39788080)
Thank you for catching that. Corrected.
Re:Amazon Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series
by hackerlight on Friday March 22, 2024 @08:22AM
(#39789951)
> ensemble of transformer models
Isn't that just dropout?
Re:Amazon Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series
by mikkom on Friday March 22, 2024 @10:31AM
(#39791118)
No. Why do you think so?
Re:Amazon Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series
by hackerlight on Friday March 22, 2024 @08:09PM
(#39796152)
Geoffrey Hinton describes dropout that way. It's like you're training different nets each time dropout changes.
Re:Amazon Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series
by wenc on Saturday March 23, 2024 @11:03AM
(#39800453)
Dropout is different from ensembles. It is a regularization method.
It might look like an ensemble because you’re selecting different subsets but ensembles combine different independent models rather than just subset models.
Re:Amazon Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series
by wenc on Saturday March 23, 2024 @01:48PM
(#39801727)
That said random forests are an internal ensemble, so I guess that could work.
In my mind an ensemble is like a committee. For it to be effective, each member should be independent (able to pick up different signals) and have a greater than random chance of being correct.
Re:Amazon Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Series
by hackerlight on Saturday March 23, 2024 @11:20PM
(#39804918)
I am aware it is not literally an ensemble model, but Geoffrey Hinton says it achieves the same thing conceptually and practically.
Transformer/ML models by themselves have a tendency to overfit past patterns. They pick up more signal in the patterns, but they also pick up spurious patterns. They're low bias but high variance.
It would be more interesting to compare an ensemble of transformer models with an ensemble of linear models to see which is more accurate.
(that said, it's pretty impressive that an ensemble of simple linear models can beat a large scale transformer model -- this tells me the domain being forecast has a high degree of variance, which transformer models by themselves don't do well on.)