> I often wonder if all of the sub-optimalities in our "advanced, 'scientific' culture" are purely coincidences / oversights. That people seem to so reliably (in frequency, and form) have an innate and very strong aversion (a lot like how religious or anti-religious people get nervous/agitated if one is to call into question the truth of scripture) to discussing such matters in the context of concrete reality makes me more than a little suspicious.

I think you are right, but I am not sure what the underlying problem is. I wonder whether there is a bit of cowardice there and a fear of where the line of thought will lead - not wanting to turn the stone over for fear of what you will find. Our scientific culture is afraid of facing facts.