News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why did we wait so long for the bicycle? (2019) by throw0101b on Thursday March 21, 2024 @07:06AM (#39777094)
> One point this article misses is the size of the cities. Until mid-1800 cities were at most 1-1.5 km long, usually just 2-3 streets.

See perhaps:

> Marchetti's constant is the average time spent by a person for commuting each day. Its value is approximately one hour, or half an hour for a one-way trip. It is named after Italian physicist Cesare Marchetti, though Marchetti himself attributed the "one hour" finding to transportation analyst and engineer Yacov Zahavi.[1]

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marchetti%27s_constant

* https://archive.is/edypl / https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-08-29/the-commu...

Re:Why did we wait so long for the bicycle? (2019) by golergka on Thursday March 21, 2024 @07:56AM (#39777417)
What happened to these constants with WFH? Personally, I have a lot of productive days now when I don't even leave my home.
Re:Why did we wait so long for the bicycle? (2019) by paxys on Thursday March 21, 2024 @08:22AM (#39777618)
People who work from home are still a tiny minority. They may skew the numbers somewhat, but definitely not to a very great degree.
Re:Why did we wait so long for the bicycle? (2019) by rsynnott on Thursday March 21, 2024 @09:08AM (#39778063)
When forced to WFH during the pandemic, I tended to walk aimlessly for an hour or so after work to compensate.

I felt a fairly strong _compulsion_ to do that. Marchetti might be onto something...

Re:Why did we wait so long for the bicycle? (2019) by marcosdumay on Thursday March 21, 2024 @07:50AM (#39777378)
I really doubt this holds today.
Re:Why did we wait so long for the bicycle? (2019) by throw0101b on Thursday March 21, 2024 @07:55AM (#39777414)