Re:We've Been Treating Concussions All Wrong
by squabbles on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @04:19PM
(#39771539)
That isn't the speed of light.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:We've Been Treating Concussions All Wrong
by rimunroe on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @06:26PM
(#39772751)
To anyone reading this now and thinking, “299,792,458 m/s is the speed of light!”: stairlane’s comment originally gave 299,456,352 m/s as the speed of light. Unfortunately they’ve since edited it to the correct value, thus ruining a very good exchange
Re:We've Been Treating Concussions All Wrong
by Handprint4469 on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @04:24PM
(#39771602)
This is the most terrifying exchange I've read on HN in a while
Re:We've Been Treating Concussions All Wrong
by Boogie_Man on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @04:47PM
(#39771827)
The smack to the head sent him into a parallel dimension with a different speed of light and he's just now finding out.
Re:We've Been Treating Concussions All Wrong
by MobileVet on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @04:29PM
(#39771654)
Harsh. Considering that most of us remember it as 3x10^8 m/s I was willing to roll with it.
Apparently he is a little off. 299,792,458 m/s according to Wikipedia
Re:We've Been Treating Concussions All Wrong
by tialaramex on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @05:11PM
(#39772091)
Right, and that's a definition. Modern SI works by defining constants, so then when scientists figure out a way to measure more exactly they're actually refining our understanding of the SI units, the numbers (such as the speed of light in metres per second) never change any more, so that's convenient.
Re:We've Been Treating Concussions All Wrong
by bhaney on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @04:34PM
(#39771698)
It is in a material with a refractive index of 1.001122387 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re:We've Been Treating Concussions All Wrong
by posix_compliant on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @04:25PM
(#39771614)
Probably meant to type km/s
Re:We've Been Treating Concussions All Wrong
by SAI_Peregrinus on Thursday March 21, 2024 @09:46AM
(#39778448)
Just the wrong number, at least for light in a vacuum. 299,792,458 m/s is the correct value.