Re:Suspicious discontinuities (2020)
by lynx23 on Wednesday March 20, 2024 @02:21PM
(#39770221)
And given how much (light) abuse I know about in personal circles, and how some people think they deserve everything they can claim, strict rules are likely a rather good idea.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> some people think they deserve everything they can claim
If they are able to claim something doesn't it stand to reason that we think they deserve it? I am confused how you'd measure your qualification for welfare without using the qualification metrics.
At the end of the day welfare in the US extremely stingy even if you manage to max it out - it can be a struggle to survive in a lot of areas due to a lack of CoL adjustments.
Re:Suspicious discontinuities (2020)
by JoshTriplett on Thursday March 21, 2024 @05:53AM
(#39776604)
A program strict enough to ensure that absolutely zero people get it who "shouldn't" is also a program strict enough that many of the people who should get it don't. Not because they don't meet the criteria, but because the bureaucracy around vetting people is sufficiently hard to navigate.