Re:EPA bans asbestos, a deadly carcinogen still in use decad...
by the_other on Tuesday March 19, 2024 @03:47AM
(#39753728)
If government isn’t protecting the people it represents, why have one?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:EPA bans asbestos, a deadly carcinogen still in use decad...
by coldtea on Tuesday March 19, 2024 @04:57AM
(#39753944)
It's not like the people are asked, or have a choice on the matter of having a government
Re:EPA bans asbestos, a deadly carcinogen still in use decad...
by the_other on Friday March 22, 2024 @08:48AM
(#39790178)
Lots of things pre-date their users: plates, wheels, farming, aeroplanes. The lack of choice in the matter isn’t in itself a reason to discount the phenomenon. The nature of the phenomenon is more important. In the case of government (or lack), its nature should inform its form and behaviour.
My earlier point was more like “what is this government doing if not looking after those it represents?” If its not doing as it should, we should change it.
(I’m open to ideas of anarchistic self determination. Most “good” implementations seem to have some form of coalition and/or committee-with-sphere-of-responsibility which looks like government if you squint so I’m a bit hazy how you do it. Happy to learn)