News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C++ creator rebuts White House warning by hgs3 on Monday March 18, 2024 @10:46PM (#39752464)
> So, other than maintaining a legacy code base, why try at this point when other options are available?

What options would you recommend in 2024? I write C (not C++) and work on projects that are inherently memory unsafe (the last one required hand-written assembly code). I've explored potential C successors in the past, but have yet to discover one that matches the freedoms, simplicity, ergonomics, and performance of the C language.

Re:C++ creator rebuts White House warning by ttfkam on Tuesday March 19, 2024 @12:21AM (#39752922)
Zig. It's not as safe as Rust, but it's a hell of a lot better than C while remaining largely interoperable.