News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber to pay $272M to Australian taxi operators by Ekaros on Monday March 18, 2024 @05:28AM (#39741854)
It makes level of sense to limit number of medallions. And then also at same time cap prices and mandate availability. That is if you have a medallion you must have car on order or on road at all times. This could be achieved by multiple medallion owners working together so that there is a taxi available Wed-Thu night during rainstorm.

Also you do not want to give out so many medallions that owners cannot possibly make a living. Now transferability outside selling whole business is stupid.

Re:Uber to pay $272M to Australian taxi operators by aeyes on Monday March 18, 2024 @09:55AM (#39744570)
> cap prices

> Also you do not want to give out so many medallions that owners cannot possibly make a living

Do you really think that some government agency can come up with the correct price and license cap using Excel magic? Of course not, most likely this will just lead to corruption and an inferior service.

Let the free market find the price. If it's not possible to make a living people won't drive. Where I live taxis usually charge whatever Uber is showing.

Re:Uber to pay $272M to Australian taxi operators by Ekaros on Monday March 18, 2024 @10:13AM (#39744834)
If you want free market to find the price. Why not force Uber and Lyft to accept pricing from their drivers. Absolutely any pricing and any rules. I think that would be reasonable.
Re:Uber to pay $272M to Australian taxi operators by throwawaymaths on Monday March 18, 2024 @11:00AM (#39745486)
Thats what sidecar did, and the driver market rejected it because it was an awful and unsafe experience. Imagine trying to set rates while you're driving around!
Re:Uber to pay $272M to Australian taxi operators by aeyes on Monday March 18, 2024 @01:52PM (#39747616)
Uber shows how much they will pay, the driver doesn't have to accept the trip. If drivers don't accept Uber will have to adjust the price.