Re:Vision Pro: What we got wrong at Oculus that Apple got right
by diffeomorphism on Friday March 15, 2024 @11:56AM
(#39717185)
Looking at the number of articles which compare m3 macbooks against "intel" but mean "the intel macbook from years ago", I totally expect to read lots of articles which pretend non-apple devices don't exist.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Vision Pro: What we got wrong at Oculus that Apple got right
by esafak on Friday March 15, 2024 @03:47PM
(#39719905)
Given that those Intel laptops run Windows, which today is worse than any old version of MacOS, can you blame them?
Re:Vision Pro: What we got wrong at Oculus that Apple got right
by int_19h on Friday March 15, 2024 @04:38PM
(#39720463)
Worse for what, though?
If you do a lot of gaming, for example, macOS is in many ways worse than Linux even.
Re:Vision Pro: What we got wrong at Oculus that Apple got right
by serf on Friday March 15, 2024 @05:34PM
(#39720962)
I hate windows as much as the herd, but OS choice isn't always as clean as "better or worse".
I need to run Windows in some form for various industry specific needs that a VM or emulation simply cannot meet at the moment. I don't like it, but that isn't going to change the state of things.
It's a delight to be able to choose what and where you work with, but it's not the reality a lot of us have to deal with.
Re:Vision Pro: What we got wrong at Oculus that Apple got right
by MBCook on Friday March 15, 2024 @11:08PM
(#39723005)
In some ways that’s understandable and can be very helpful. Because if you’re a Mac person looking to buy a new Mac then that may be what you have. Newer Intel Macs don’t exist.
If you’re a PC user looking to switch to Mac, or you’re looking for a machine and don’t care about which operating system it has, then it’s less useful.