Re:The Getty Makes Nearly 88,000 Art Images Free to Use Howe...
by imgabe on Thursday March 14, 2024 @10:41PM
(#39711538)
In practice, you still need the museum's cooperation to do anything commercial with it, for most people who don't have the resources to defend a lawsuit.
Re:The Getty Makes Nearly 88,000 Art Images Free to Use Howe...
by autoexec on Thursday March 14, 2024 @10:44PM
(#39711560)
More importantly, even though you can't copyright a photo/scan of a public domain work you also don't have to share those images with others at all, you could still paywall them off and (arguably) impose additional restrictions as a condition of getting access, and you certainly don't have to host the files online for everyone like this.
Re:The Getty Makes Nearly 88,000 Art Images Free to Use Howe...
by ufocia on Friday March 15, 2024 @01:51AM
(#39712431)
Yes, you could physically and contractually prohibit others from copying the original work.
Re:The Getty Makes Nearly 88,000 Art Images Free to Use Howe...
by dtech on Friday March 15, 2024 @05:26AM
(#39713646)
Could you though? Once you have a good image if it isn't copyrighted it sounds like any licencing agreement is void. You could just distribute not under terms of the license, but as a public domain images.
Re:The Getty Makes Nearly 88,000 Art Images Free to Use Howe...
by Animats on Friday March 15, 2024 @12:28AM
(#39712077)
Wikipedia has assumed, since Bridgeman vs. Corel, that images of public domain works are public domain. Once some portrait museum in the UK threatened to sue, but backed down quickly.
Museums like to pretend that they hold copyrights on these photos. They do not.
(In the US).
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel....