And if you're certain that "management doesn't have it" and can convince enough other investors to provide funding then you can take over the entire company and run it as you see fit. Activist investors like Pershing Square Capital Management do this all the time, and despite some high profile failures on average they are very successful.
And there is fundamentally no major difference between paying dividends versus stock buybacks, just a matter of tax efficiency. It's sad to see people (who likely aren't even shareholders) complaining about buybacks without understanding that.
> just a matter of tax efficiency
Yes, and that shouldn't be how it works. Its basically tax evasion.
> It's sad to see people (who likely aren't even shareholders) complaining about buybacks without understanding that.
Understanding it isn't the issue, its just different having different values.
It's hilarious how you put these two sentences together completely ignoring the possibility of selling you shares on the open market if you "prefer to get your capital back". That's a real display of ignorance.