News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner... by csa on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @04:27PM (#39697030)
> The funny thing is there's not really that much propaganda on TikTok

I recommend that you sit down in front of your computer with your beverage of choice and do a deep dive into psyops.

To address your comment, there are psyops actors in every significant (and some less significant) social media platform, even our own Hacker News. Whether you want to call their work “propaganda” or something else is mostly semantics — they are operating with an agenda, sometimes/often one that conflicts with the will and/or best interest of our nation (in my case, the US).

Re:House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner... by zachmu on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @04:45PM (#39697246)
Indeed, we are so awash in propaganda it's often difficult to recognize it as such.

"What's water?"

Re:House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner... by k12sosse on Wednesday March 13, 2024 @11:57PM (#39700464)
We've had a lot of fun watching people make "I'm being gangstalked" videos over the last couple years. YT, not TikTok.
Re:House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner... by groggo on Monday March 18, 2024 @12:21PM (#39746490)
Fair enough... I consider that all propaganda. Anyone acting with an agenda, especially when they're trying to persuade without openly disclosing their agenda. Even more so, there's plenty of people who post stuff (like the fringe violence or whatever) who aren't necessarily psyops, but then the algo can promote it in a way that influences people. And I know this can all be done gradually and subtly.

But you should do a deep dive on tiktok if you aren't already on it! It's almost all fun/bizarre/educational videos. When you have so many people (lawmakers) critiquing it who don't use it regularly, it all just comes across as McCarthyism.

(edited to remove a sentence I started and didn't finish)