News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What Extropic Is Building by lumost on Monday March 11, 2024 @06:08PM (#39673800)
It did make me curious however, if we dropped the requirement that operations return correct values in favor of probably correct values - would we see any material computing gains in hardware? Large neural models are intrinsically error correcting and stochastic.

I’m unfortunately not familiar enough with hardware to weigh in.

Re:What Extropic Is Building by IshKebab on Monday March 11, 2024 @06:53PM (#39674130)
The trouble is if you use actual randomness then you lose repeatability which is an incredibly useful property of computers. Have fun debugging that!

What you want is low precision with stochastic rounding. Graphcore's IPUs have that and it's a really great feature. It lets you use really low precision number formats but effectively "dithers" the error. Same thing as dithering images or noise shaping audio.

Re:What Extropic Is Building by lumost on Monday March 11, 2024 @07:01PM (#39674180)
Yeah debugging would be a pain, but in the context of inference/training unnecessary. There is some set of ops which requires high precision, if I L2 normalize a tensor - I really need it to be normalized. But matmul/addition? Maybe there is wiggle room.

Big challenge would be whether any gains could compete with the economy of scale from NVidia.