News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:S3 is files, but not a filesystem by _flux on Sunday March 10, 2024 @06:31AM (#39658114)
But if the S3 semantics are not helping you, e.g. with multiple clients doing copy/move/delete operations in the hierarchy you could still end up with files that are not in "directories".

So essentially an S3 file manager must be able to handle the situation where there are files without a "directory"—and that I assume is also the most common case as well for S3. Might just not have the "directories" in the first place.

Re:S3 is files, but not a filesystem by klodolph on Sunday March 10, 2024 @09:53AM (#39659071)
I have personally never seen the 0-byte files people keep talking about here. In every S3 bucket I’ve ever looked at, the “directories” don’t exist at all. If you have a dir/file1.txt and dir/file2.txt, there is NO such object as dir. Not even a placeholder.
Re:S3 is files, but not a filesystem by _flux on Sunday March 10, 2024 @10:13AM (#39659249)
Yeah, this post was the first one I had even heard of them.