Re:Why do people bother with open source?
by AstralStorm on Saturday March 09, 2024 @02:15PM
(#39654008)
Not quite Marxist but sort of neo-Proudhon.
What makes anything intellectual property really?
(Unless it's literally personal property, such as a diary contents.) Renumeration is one thing, property another.
Re:Why do people bother with open source?
by andybak on Saturday March 09, 2024 @12:43PM
(#39653349)
I also think it's possible to be a Marxist without being a Tankie - I'm just not clear on the specific forms that would take.
And most post-Marxist arguments or visions have a Marxist flavor. Which is quite expected, he was very hindsightful, and correct criticism of Marx require reading and understanding his point of view.
There's definitely a Marxist flavor to this meaning, though I don't think you have to be a tankie to use it that way.