Re:Dear StackExchange: Thank You
by robbles on Saturday May 12, 2012 @03:08PM
(#3964799)
In my opinion, that IS an ambiguous question. Not in the sense that it's hard to understand approximately what you're looking for, but that it's not obvious how to choose the right answers. I agree that this kind of moderation can be a bit heavy-handed, but I think one of the goals of SO is to have provably correct solutions to questions, not an "answer wiki" like Quora. You can't really "accept the right answer" to this question in any fair way.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Dear StackExchange: Thank You
by EvilTerran on Saturday May 12, 2012 @06:22PM
(#3965349)
I wouldn't say "ambiguous". I'll grant you "subjective".
Does stackexchange forbid questions where there's an element of opinion, because the system's set up only for questions with "one right answer"? That seems awfully restrictive in the name of a system limitation.
Especially as, as 4ad observed, the asker chooses an incorrect answer annoyingly often -- so the "best answer" isn't always actually the best. As such, it's advisable to at least flick through the other answers anyway, despite this rule.
No, opinion is welcome (on Stack Exchange, not necessarily on Stack Overflow) but it needs to be backed up by research or fact.
That's not the problem on the sample question.
Re:Dear StackExchange: Thank You
by skeletonjelly on Sunday May 13, 2012 @02:00AM
(#3966186)
> You can't really "accept the right answer" to this question in any fair way.
I see that as the issue - that there has to be one answer. It's a site that promotes the same issue that plagues reddit, the hunger for karma.