Re:Chlorpyrifos: Pesticide tied to brain damage in children
by stareatgoats on Friday March 08, 2024 @04:08PM
(#39646517)
Not sure if I am a harbinger of cheerfulness exactly, but I believe I can see hope in the long-term trajectory. The idea that everything needs to be sustainable is slowly gaining traction. Too slowly, obviously, but the momentum is there nonetheless.
The notion that we need to have a fraction cheaper foodstuffs at the expense of poisoning the environment and ourselves is already dead, the job now is primarily to document the havoc and point to viable solutions.
Re:Chlorpyrifos: Pesticide tied to brain damage in children
by Lutger on Friday March 08, 2024 @03:54PM
(#39646350)
Yeah I have something, I think its basically not true that yields are lower when you implement the cutting edge stuff AEA is doing.
Current legislation and politics doesn't help, but true regenerative ag (not greenwashed) will also outperform conventional ag in the free market eventually. This is beyond just organic, making use of the latest scientific insights, on plant sap analysis and being data driven.
Re:Chlorpyrifos: Pesticide tied to brain damage in children
by kjkjadksj on Friday March 08, 2024 @03:55PM
(#39646369)
Yields are higher than they need to be already for many crops and subsidies have long distorted the market and arguably have incentivized the wrong things. We could stand a bit of inefficiency if we gain a lot of resilience and other nth order beneficial effects to the ecosystem as a result.
Those are all good ideas! If I had a magic wand to wave to create that world, I would. But, in the world as it exists, it's really, really difficult to persuade enough people to change behavior (and legislation) enough to make all that happen quickly.
Barring disaster, of course. Which may be where "conventional" agriculture is taking us.
I find the whole subject, and many others of modernity, depressing: we know what has to be done, but see no way of achieving it.
Anyone have anything cheerful to tell me?