News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Scaling memcached at Facebook by staunch on Friday December 12, 2008 @08:13PM (#396346)
On Facebook or Google scale it makes total sense. They're using 800 servers instead of 3,200. That's probably $5-$10 million dollars in savings. Easily enough to pay the salaries of a few developers to maintain this stuff even if that was their only job.

It does seem like it's just flimsy excuses not to merge up the changes, but hopefully they'll put more emphasis on it after a while.

Re:Scaling memcached at Facebook by retyred on Friday December 12, 2008 @10:23PM (#396444)
you can't put fb and google in the same category. fb is still surviving on investment capital and frankly could end up in a serious cashcrunch. google has a blank check for hardware. both companies have reason to worry about hardware expenditures, but facebook's is more imminent