Re:Ex-Google engineer charged with stealing AI trade secrets
by monktastic1 on Thursday March 07, 2024 @09:41AM
(#39629643)
If he felt that he had to "get out in time," then he knew he did something "wrong" in the sense that my parent is (presumably) asking about. That's the only question I'm answering. You seem intent on drawing me into a debate about subtleties of moral and legal ethics, but I'm sorry to say I'm not interested right now.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ex-Google engineer charged with stealing AI trade secrets
by fkyoureadthedoc on Thursday March 07, 2024 @10:01AM
(#39629906)
And yet you're the one who brought it up
Re:Ex-Google engineer charged with stealing AI trade secrets
by freedomben on Thursday March 07, 2024 @10:17AM
(#39630113)
GP asked a clarifying question. You're desire to read into the question and make assumptions about what you think must have been their intent, rather than just taking the question at face value does not mean GP is "the one who brought it up."
Re:Ex-Google engineer charged with stealing AI trade secrets
by fkyoureadthedoc on Monday March 11, 2024 @09:38AM
(#39668083)
I've not read into anything. Someone brings up a subject, someone else expands on it, then the person who brought it up to begin with starts complaining about what they got. It's stupid, waste of text.
Don't reply to me btw. I didn't bring this up for you to speak about it.
Re:Ex-Google engineer charged with stealing AI trade secrets
by monktastic1 on Thursday March 07, 2024 @10:33AM
(#39630328)
What I'm inferring from this truly bizarre thread is that some people assume that clarifying questions are always fronts for hidden motivations (such as springing "gotchas" or getting into debates). It might be worthwhile to consider that not all people operate that way.