I'm not sure how anyone believed they would open source their proprietary AI, or what that would even mean.
Did OpenAI ever even officially define what open source means in this context? Is the training algorithm open source? Or the data model? Or the interpretation engine that reads the model and spits out content? Or some combination of all three?
> even though sharing everything is definitely the right strategy in the short and possibly medium term for recruitment purposes
Now we have the clear proof that it was their clear intention from the start to abuse from the naivety of everyone pretending to have an open sourcing goal when in fact they knew planned from the beginning to close everything once they would reach a certain amount of success.
That sucks...