> What are you implying?
I'm not implying anything. I'm pointing out a lack of openness on OpenAI's part.
Re:OpenAI and Elon Musk
by EMIRELADERO on Tuesday March 05, 2024 @11:09PM
(#39612198)
Unless it's brought up as a point in court, actual exhibits in lawsuits don't have DKIM signatures either.
I'm not making a legal argument.
Re:OpenAI and Elon Musk
by EMIRELADERO on Tuesday March 05, 2024 @11:57PM
(#39612482)
Oh!
In that case, let me ask: where have you ever seen DKIM signatures being provided on a public blog post/press release?
Nowhere, and I criticize it every time. I've even gone to the lengths of trying to find DKIM keys for published emails in the past[1].
But at least those emails were un-redacted. To spell that out for you: in a highly-charged, highly-contentious political setting, emails were published un-redacted and theoretically verifiable with DKIM. No such possibility exists for OpenAI's blog post.
Re:OpenAI and Elon Musk
by EMIRELADERO on Wednesday March 06, 2024 @05:19AM
(#39614360)
What benefit would that bring, considering the points raised earlier?
What are you implying? Faking emails opens you up to libel. I doubt OpenAI is trying to add another lawsuit to their workload.