Re:Amazon just bought a 100% nuclear-powered data center
by kjkjadksj on Tuesday March 05, 2024 @08:13PM
(#39611129)
I tried to look up how many potentially used nuclear powered ships are out there, since you could just drop an anchor and a ton of power all over the world with one, but it seems like a surprisingly short list outside of US navy. I guess it would make sense due to nonproliferation. What a shame though. Imagine if every other container ship had one of these power plants how many remote areas would probably meet a great deal of their energy needs from a battery array in their shipping port, rather than the current paradigm where they must provide dirty fuel for shipping companies that goes on to pollute the harbor.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon just bought a 100% nuclear-powered data center
by devoutsalsa on Wednesday March 06, 2024 @01:25AM
(#39612906)
Imagine a nuclear powered container ship captured by pirates.
Re:Amazon just bought a 100% nuclear-powered data center
by ritabratamaiti on Wednesday March 06, 2024 @01:52AM
(#39613070)
Would not do them any good, without the skilled manpower to operate and maintain it
Re:Amazon just bought a 100% nuclear-powered data center
by devoutsalsa on Wednesday March 06, 2024 @02:21AM
(#39613239)
As I understand it, naval reactors are cooled by seawater. Couldn't the coolant be diverted, causing the reactor to overheat and eventually meltdown? How dangerous a naval reactor meltdown would be I have no idea.
Re:Amazon just bought a 100% nuclear-powered data center
by preisschild on Wednesday March 06, 2024 @04:45AM
(#39614131)
Definitely not good, but wayyy less dangerous for humans and the environment than a huge oil spill