News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is an open-source pacemaker safer than closed-source? by tomp on Friday May 11, 2012 @12:00PM (#3959869)
I know of a guy who had a defective pacemaker.

While he was having a shower, he got shocked, he assumed it was electricity. After a few more shocks, he quickly realized that it's his pacemakers. He took a number of additional shocks before he was sedated in a hospital.

Now, he's still got the pacemaker inside, but it's off. It turns out that the company making the pacemakers knew that a small percentage were defective and that things like this could happen (unfortunately, I don't know what company that is).

He's lucky he's still alive. He said that he's never going to have another (active) pacemaker - he'd rather die than have to go through such painful experience again.

Re:Is an open-source pacemaker safer than closed-source? by fr0sty on Friday May 11, 2012 @12:51PM (#3960119)
Nit-pick: pacemakers don't shock you, internal cardioverter defibrillators do.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/pacemakersandimplantabled...

Re:Is an open-source pacemaker safer than closed-source? by ctdonath on Friday May 11, 2012 @12:07PM (#3959898)
Easy to say if you have the option to go without. I don't.