Re:SpaceX just achieved speed of 17Mb/s from satellite to st...
by londons_explore on Sunday March 03, 2024 @12:09PM
(#39582167)
> more drag
That's true - although the antenna can be oriented to be perfectly parallel to the direction of travel - therefore only experiencing drag from the edge cross sectional area.
> increasing interference with astronomy
The antenna could be painted matt black. It can also consist of ~95% holes without much loss in functionality.
> increased collision risk,
I don't think it will matter while the number of uncontrollable satellites remains low. If I were a regulator, I would put a cap on the number of uncontrollable satellites that may be in orbit at any given time, and if that cap is exceeded prevent all new launches and require active de-orbiting of existing ones.
That's true - although the antenna can be oriented to be perfectly parallel to the direction of travel - therefore only experiencing drag from the edge cross sectional area.
> increasing interference with astronomy
The antenna could be painted matt black. It can also consist of ~95% holes without much loss in functionality.
> increased collision risk,
I don't think it will matter while the number of uncontrollable satellites remains low. If I were a regulator, I would put a cap on the number of uncontrollable satellites that may be in orbit at any given time, and if that cap is exceeded prevent all new launches and require active de-orbiting of existing ones.