Re:Why I'm thrilled Mark Zuckerberg is annoying the bankers
by surrealize on Thursday May 10, 2012 @08:31PM
(#3956912)
Sure, the extra liquidity is nice for people who hold shares. But, at the same time, the IPO is clearly not a big deal to Zuckerberg, as evidenced by 1. the fact that they've waited until now, and, yes, 2. by the hoodie.
What's the percentage of firms with >500 investors that don't IPO?
I wonder if increasing the number of investors past 500 is more about using equity as a recruiting/retention tool than it is about cash.
Re:Why I'm thrilled Mark Zuckerberg is annoying the bankers
by veyron on Thursday May 10, 2012 @09:02PM
(#3957014)
I think you trivialize a very important point, namely that the IPO is a big deal for pretty much everyone (as its used as a recruiting tool for employees and as an exit proposition for VC firms), especially to Zuckerberg (who invariably spun stories of potential exits as part of the process).
I think we can agree on the two facts, namely:
- the firm probably doesnt need the cash
- the members of the firm and investors do want the exit provided by an IPO
Re:Why I'm thrilled Mark Zuckerberg is annoying the bankers
by surrealize on Thursday May 10, 2012 @09:13PM
(#3957041)
OK! </thread>
If the exit wasn't important, they would stay private and run the business.