Meta rebuffs Google's virtual reality tie-up proposal

Re:Meta rebuffs Google's virtual reality tie-up proposal by ToucanLoucan on Friday March 01, 2024 @05:07PM (#39567361)

Incredibly bold assertion that a Meta-backed VR headset won't be just as silo'd off as a Google-backed one. Google is 100% distrustworthy for sure, but is Meta really any better at all?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Meta rebuffs Google's virtual reality tie-up proposal by nerdjon on Friday March 01, 2024 @05:15PM (#39567433)

I think you misunderstood.

I’m not claiming that Meta won’t be Silo’d off by making their own. But Google is not going to be the one that should be trusted to make a platform for multiple devices.

Like it would be great if we had such a platform from a company that won’t abandon it in a few months.

But instead we are likely just going to have Silo’d systems.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Meta rebuffs Google's virtual reality tie-up proposal by belval on Friday March 01, 2024 @05:11PM (#39567387)

It's a weird world out there these days, but only one of them open-sourced their LLMs so maybe?

[ Parent | on HN ]