Re:Orbital reentry from 17000mph looks like dropping out of ...
by davedx on Wednesday February 28, 2024 @05:38PM
(#39544388)
F9 landing is not trivial, and despite all the comments on this thread trying to back up the claim this is the “first commercial spacecraft to land on US soil” ludicrous.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Orbital reentry from 17000mph looks like dropping out of ...
by peeters on Thursday February 29, 2024 @09:53AM
(#39550063)
I wasn't trying to extend the analogy to saying landing F9 is trivial. But F9 surviving re-entry is fairly trivial, which is the important difference between the two. Once you've survived re-entry and slowed down to terminal velocity, there's not a huge difference between landing from orbital and sub-orbital trajectories. I agree that the way it's phrased is fairly meaningless and reeks of baseball commentary cherry-picking, but surviving from orbit is still a very different milestone than surviving from sub-orbit.