News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Orbital reentry from 17000mph looks like dropping out of ... by davedx on Wednesday February 28, 2024 @05:38PM (#39544388)
F9 landing is not trivial, and despite all the comments on this thread trying to back up the claim this is the “first commercial spacecraft to land on US soil” ludicrous.
Re:Orbital reentry from 17000mph looks like dropping out of ... by peeters on Thursday February 29, 2024 @09:53AM (#39550063)
I wasn't trying to extend the analogy to saying landing F9 is trivial. But F9 surviving re-entry is fairly trivial, which is the important difference between the two. Once you've survived re-entry and slowed down to terminal velocity, there's not a huge difference between landing from orbital and sub-orbital trajectories. I agree that the way it's phrased is fairly meaningless and reeks of baseball commentary cherry-picking, but surviving from orbit is still a very different milestone than surviving from sub-orbit.