News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Let Everybody Sing by aidenn0 on Wednesday February 28, 2024 @03:57PM (#39543323)
Basing it off of [1], nothing is lost from traditional notation, inasmuch as it's extra notation on top of traditional notation. In this sense, it's a bit similar to furigana[2] for Japanese, as an aid to readers. Something that surprised me is that [1] is of a minor key, but the solfege marks are for the relative major. I'm not a singer, so I can't say as to how/why that makes sense.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Harp#/media/File:Windha...

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furigana

Re:Let Everybody Sing by arthurdenture on Wednesday February 28, 2024 @04:13PM (#39543504)
> Something that surprised me is that [1] is of a minor key, but the solfege marks are for the relative major

Major and minor keys use the same shapes / solfege system. The major scale is "fa, so, la, fa, so, la, mi, fa", while the minor scale uses the same syllables but starts on la. This means that the shapes always represent the same intervals (i.e. pattern of whole and half steps) whether a song is in a major or minor. It's hard to describe but makes sense when singing.

Re:Let Everybody Sing by aidenn0 on Wednesday February 28, 2024 @10:23PM (#39546113)
I'm aware that they are the same intervals; perhaps my brain is destroyed by my music theory classes, but I really think of a minor scale as a different beast from a major scale starting on the submediant. [1] indicates that other movable do systems may use "la" based minors, and that it is "sometimes preferred in choral music, especially with children," so I suspect this distinction is something I learned.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solf%C3%A8ge#Minor