Re:"14 Years of Go" by Rob Pike
by tsimionescu on Tuesday February 27, 2024 @03:26PM
(#39529356)
> I am pretty sure that
> or you'll overengineer a complex solution to make AB return some kind of object that can recognize the subsequent + operation etc.
> was a later edit, I don't remember reading it when I first reacted to your comment. If so, doing that is not really nice, since it breaks the flow of the reactions.
I'm honestly not even sure. I had this in mind from the beginning, but I may have initially had a different vaguer comment about it and edited, I'm not sure. I sometimes edit comments right after posting them and then don't leave a note like I did for the later edit of the *s, since I assume no one read them. If this happened, I apologize.
Either way, yes, I think we are mostly in agreement. I'm not actually a big fan of Go's minimalism, so I actually see the value of such constructs.
> or you'll overengineer a complex solution to make AB return some kind of object that can recognize the subsequent + operation etc.
> was a later edit, I don't remember reading it when I first reacted to your comment. If so, doing that is not really nice, since it breaks the flow of the reactions.
I'm honestly not even sure. I had this in mind from the beginning, but I may have initially had a different vaguer comment about it and edited, I'm not sure. I sometimes edit comments right after posting them and then don't leave a note like I did for the later edit of the *s, since I assume no one read them. If this happened, I apologize.
Either way, yes, I think we are mostly in agreement. I'm not actually a big fan of Go's minimalism, so I actually see the value of such constructs.