Re:Forgejo makes a full break from Gitea
by timetraveller26 on Tuesday February 27, 2024 @03:09PM
(#39529094)
You can use Woodpecker and not be tied to Github
Re:Forgejo makes a full break from Gitea
by shp0ngle on Tuesday February 27, 2024 @01:41PM
(#39527809)
Gitea and forgejo don't have CI/CD at all.
Re:Forgejo makes a full break from Gitea
by Pet_Ant on Tuesday February 27, 2024 @03:35PM
(#39529505)
> Gitea ... don't have CI/CD at all.
That seems to be no longer the case?
>> Starting with Gitea 1.19, Gitea Actions are available as a built-in CI/CD solution. ... It is similar and compatible to GitHub Actions, and its name is inspired by it too.
https://docs.gitea.com/next/usage/actions/overview
Which seems to have been released almost a year ago
Re:Forgejo makes a full break from Gitea
by shp0ngle on Tuesday February 27, 2024 @04:38PM
(#39530343)
Ah I did not look at gitea for about 2 years. That's cool!
Re:Forgejo makes a full break from Gitea
by __jonas on Tuesday February 27, 2024 @01:51PM
(#39527961)
Forgejo has experimental CI/CD
https://forgejo.org/2023-02-27-forgejo-actions/
They make no guarantee of compatibility with Github Actions but they seem to be aiming for it based on the syntax.
Re:Forgejo makes a full break from Gitea
by BrittonR on Tuesday February 27, 2024 @01:45PM
(#39527872)
https://forgejo.org/docs/v1.20/user/actions/
https://docs.gitea.com/usage/actions/overview
Both have “Actions” that are act based and very similar to GitHub Actions and offers some compatibility.
Which ones are compatible with GitHub actions? To me that is the most important aspect. So much is done with those and I really don't want to relearn.