> The social media platforms took 230 beyond what is was initially intended for as a premise to weaponize it against people who's politics they don't agree with.

So what? You're taking it as a given that "if a website moderates content in a way I don't like, the government must step in and force them to do moderation in a different way I do like"; I don't accept that premise at all, it's quite totalitarian in both concept and real-world execution.