The difference I see between US/EU worldview is that in US the biggest emphasis is in what "YOU" did, disregarding luck, chance, environment factors etc. "Bill Gates created the wealth himself". People like feeling like there is a chance for them to become super powerful and important and that there is no system holding you back, even though they never actually do it but the hope/idea is very important for you. I can see this in Eastern Europe where large percentage of people dream of winning the lottery; I guess that is something from which people here draw hope of power and influence, while the same people are ok with strong social measures, high taxes, free healthcare etc. while I feel in US all these social benefits are perceived to prevent people from achieving astronomical results and hence shouldn't be.
Unfair is, if someone else grabs the stuff of the one brother and gives it to the other.
An example you probably should should think about: Who owns money and their value? What happens when the central banks decide to raise the interest rates to 20% and you loose everything? Just a shame? On the contrary, what happens when the central banks employ quantitative easing and that makes you rich? How does this interact with large-scale projects the government starts to create employment.
Not always are fiscal and monetary policies aligned. This creates either severe depressions or economic bubbles.
When an opinion is funded an understanding of to what extend the greater society defines the value of things it will have gravity. Until then, it is just noise.
You pay for stuff in the supermarket, you get a product. No strings attached. I would be surprised, if people like the idea, that if one buys a piano, that for each song being played, one has to give a dividend to the piano manufacturer. Usually the transaction is closed. Though, such deals can be made. Maybe you get the piano for free.
You pay a worker that what you think is needed to make a piano. If one worker makes a billion pianos, you pay him a lot. And if you sell pianos a billion times, you become a billionaire. And if your worker can buy stocks, he will also get dividends.
The idea that billionaires have to give a share is nice and good, definitly good for hackernews stories and their socialistic readers, but that the billionaire has already given societies wealth manyfolds, well, afterall people bought their stuff to improve their lives, that made him a billionaire, that is silently forgotten.
As usual, it is play with envy and greed, how dare someone has more than me!
Hell, mining blood diamonds is fair because the local authorities allow it, mining oil from under the impoverished residents of a corrupt country is fair, skirting monopoly laws to create conglomerates is fair.
Nothing is illegal for these guys, it all gets shoved under the rug. Remember the Panama papers? What came of those? Nothing.
(While others have identified religion as a way of avoidance, to not question the status quo. Ha!)
There is not a single billionaire who has made all that money fairly; wages do not rise with inflation, environment; tax dodge; etc costs are carried on to the consumer as well. What sort of world do we live in when people like you think it's okay for things to be like this.
I don't have a problem with people being successful and accumulating wealth, but I do have a problem with the ilegitimate and corrupt practices involved in accumulating billions and trillions.
In an unfair world it is taken away from me.
It is just numbers.