Or if you're trying to imply that every person remotely related to the drug market is jointly and severely responsible for every person who dies using fentanyl, that is so far from the American conception of individual freedom and personal responsibility I don't know that there is common ground to be had.
Also as far as I can tell, very few people are setting out to deliberately do fentanyl itself. So that would point to the problem being the complete lack of otherwise standard product regulation, which also stems from prohibition.
Maybe don't be so quick to assume you know where the harm is coming from and how it is spreading.
[1]: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/opioid-manufacturer-purdue-ph...
[2]: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/05/men-wom...
and get hundreds of millions from state budget for their "nonprofits".
meanwhile Singapore, China, Philippines, Indonesia actually try to solve the problem, that include tackling the traffic and dealers + harsh sentences + they abolish the culture of drug usage
What will be court sentence for someone who stabbed 112,000 people? this is plain genocide, that US progressive liberals somehow allow to happen as "harm reduction" - while in fact it is harm increasing by spreading out everywhere