News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Xkcd: Greenhouse Effect by konschubert on Monday February 26, 2024 @10:52AM (#39512662)
You can build wind to compensate some of this.

And of course a ton of short term storage.

And then you build a bunch of cheap, inefficient gas peaker plants for the two weeks a year where neither are enough.

At the moment it looks like that will be a lot cheaper than nuclear. But if nuclear gets cheaper, that’s also a great option!

Re:Xkcd: Greenhouse Effect by ericd on Monday February 26, 2024 @12:27PM (#39514095)
Good points, all. But you'd still need to overbuild solar by quite a bit in order to make a reasonable amount in winter, in many areas.
Re:Xkcd: Greenhouse Effect by konschubert on Monday February 26, 2024 @01:38PM (#39515149)
In Northern Europe, you definitely need Wind power and probably some natural gas dispatchable capacity.

In most other places, you can overbuild the PV panels. Which isn't too bad, since you do not have to overbuild inverters or grid connections.

Re:Xkcd: Greenhouse Effect by ta1243 on Tuesday March 05, 2024 @05:22AM (#39601543)
Or hydrogen. On windy days (or sunny in the southern US) you use the excess electricity to generate hydrogen, and then when there's a shortfall you convert it back to electricity.